Shulamith Firestone

Quotes

  1. The ideology of school was the ideology of childhood. It operated on the assumption that children needed"discipline," that they were special creatures who had to be handled in a special way (child psych., child ed., etc.) and that to facilitate this they should be corralled in a special place with tie own kind, and with an age group as restricted to their own as possible.

    p. 87

    Book cover: The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist RevolutionThe Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
  2. Now, in 1970, we are experiencing a major scientific breakthrough. The new physics, relativity, and the astrophysical theories of contemporary science had already been realized by the first part of this century. Now, in the latter part, we are arriving, with the help of the electron microscope and other new tools, at similar achievements in biology, biochemistry, and all the life sciences. Important discoveries are made yearly by small, scattered work teams all over the United States, and in other countries as well – of the magnitude of DNA in genetics, or of Urey and Miller’s work in the early fifties on the origins of life. Full mastery of the reproductive process is in sight, and there has been significant advance in understanding the basic life and death process. The nature of ageing and growth, sleep and hibernation, the chemical functioning of the brain and the development of consciousness and memory are all beginning to be understood in their entirety. This acceleration promises to continue for another century, or however long it takes to achieve the goal of Empiricism: total understanding of the laws of nature.

    p. 179

    Book cover: The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist RevolutionThe Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
  3. The classic trap for any revolutionary is always, ‘What’s your alternative?’ But even if you could provide the interrogator with a blueprint, this does not mean he would use it: in most cases he is not sincere in wanting to know. In fact this is a common offensive, a technique to deflect revolutionary anger and turn it against itself. Moreover, the oppressed have no job to convince all people. All they need know is that the present system is destroying them.

    p. 226

    Book cover: The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist RevolutionThe Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
  4. Self-regulation is the basis of freedom, and dependence the origin of inequality.

    p. 97

    Book cover: The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist RevolutionThe Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
  5. Bliss in love is seldom the case: for every successful contemporary love experience, for every short period of enrichment, there are ten destructive love experiences, post-love ‘downs’ of much longer duration – often resulting in the destruction of the individual, or at least an emotional cynicism that makes it difficult or impossible ever to love again.

    p. 128

    Book cover: The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist RevolutionThe Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
  6. Most revolutionary movements are unable to practise among themselves what they preach. Strong leadership cults, factionalism, ‘ego-tripping’, backbiting are the rule rather than the exception.

    p. 39

    Book cover: The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist RevolutionThe Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
  7. Matriarchy is a stage on the way to patriarchy, to man’s fullest realization of himself; he goes from worshipping Nature through women to conquering it. Though it’s true that woman’s lot worsened considerably under patriarchy, she never had it good; for despite all the nostalgia it is not hard to prove that matriarchy was never an answer to women’s fundamental oppression. Basically it was no more than a different means of counting lineage and inheritance, one which, though it might have held more advantages for women than the later patriarchy, did not allow women into the society as equals. To be worshipped is not freedom. For worship still takes place in someone else’s head, and that head belongs to Man. Thus throughout history, in all stages and types of culture, women have been oppressed due to their biological functions.

    p. 74

    Book cover: The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist RevolutionThe Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
  8. The fifties was the bleakest decade of all, perhaps the bleakest in some centuries for women.

    p. 27

    Book cover: The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist RevolutionThe Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
  9. I submit that the only way that the can make full sense is in terms of power. We must keep in mind that Freud observed this complex as common to every normal individual who grows up in the of a patriarchal society, a form of social organization that intensifies the worst effects of the inequalities inherent in the biological family itself. There is some evidence to prove that the effects of the Oedipus Complex decrease in societies where males hold less power, and that the weakening of patriarchalism produces many cultural changes that perhaps can be traced to this relaxation.

    p. 47

    Book cover: The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist RevolutionThe Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
  10. Women and children are always mentioned in the same breath ("Women and children to the forts!"). The special tie women have with children is recognized by everyone. I submit, however, that the nature of this bond is no more than shared oppression. And that moreover this oppression i intertwined and mutually reinforcing in such complex ways that we will be an able to speak of the liberation of women without also discussing the liberation of children, and since versa. The heart of woman's oppressing is her childbearing and childrearing roles. And in turn children are defined in relation to this role and are psychologically formed by it; what they become as adults and the sorts of relationships they are able to form determine the society they will ultimately built.

    p. 72

    Book cover: The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist RevolutionThe Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
  11. The feminist movement is the first to combine effectively the ‘personal’ with the ‘political’. It is developing a new way of relating, a new political style, one that will eventually reconcile the personal – always the feminine prerogative – with the public, with the ‘world outside’, to restore that world to its emotions, and literally to its senses.

    p. 38

    Book cover: The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist RevolutionThe Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution
  12. I believe Freud was talking about something real, though perhaps his ideas, taken literally, lead to absurdity – for his genius was poetic rather than scientific; his ideas are more valuable as metaphors than as literal truths.

    p. 46

    Book cover: The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist RevolutionThe Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution