# Quote — Paul R. Krugman, Pop Internationalism

> To make a harsh but not entirely unjustified analogy, a government wedded to the ideology of competitiveness is as unlikely to make good economic policy as a government committed to creationism is to make good science policy, even in areas that have no direct relationship to the theory of evolution.

- Author: [Paul R. Krugman](https://www.leafyquotes.com/paul-r-krugman.md)
- Book: [Pop Internationalism](https://www.leafyquotes.com/paul-r-krugman/pop-internationalism.md)
- Source: [Wikiquote](https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Paul_Krugman#Pop_Internationalism_(1996)) ([CC BY-SA 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/))
- Quote page: https://www.leafyquotes.com/paul-r-krugman/pop-internationalism/to-make-a-harsh

## More from this book

> So let's start telling the truth: competitiveness is a meaningless word when applied to national economies. And the obsession with competitiveness is both wrong and dangerous.

[Quote page](https://www.leafyquotes.com/paul-r-krugman/pop-internationalism/so-lets-start.md)

> If growth in East Asia is indeed running into diminishing returns, however, the conventional wisdom about an Asian-centered world economy needs some rethinking.

[Quote page](https://www.leafyquotes.com/paul-r-krugman/pop-internationalism/if-growth-in-east.md)

> This article makes three points. First, it argues that concerns about competitiveness are, as an empirical matter, almost completely unfounded. Second, it tries to explain why defining the economic problem as one of international competition is nonetheless so attractive to so many people. Finally, it argues that the obsession with competitiveness is not only wrong but dangerous, skewing domestic policies and threatening the international economic system.

[Quote page](https://www.leafyquotes.com/paul-r-krugman/pop-internationalism/this-article-makes.md)