# Quote — Norman Davies, Vanished Kingdoms

> The immediate future may be determined by a race between the United Kingdom and the EU over which beats the other to a major crisis.

- Author: [Norman Davies](https://www.leafyquotes.com/norman-davies.md)
- Book: [Vanished Kingdoms](https://www.leafyquotes.com/norman-davies/vanished-kingdoms.md)
- Page: 681
- Source: [Wikiquote](https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Norman_Davies#Vanished_Kingdoms_(2011)) ([CC BY-SA 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/))
- Quote page: https://www.leafyquotes.com/norman-davies/vanished-kingdoms/the-immediate-future

## More from this book

> That the United Kingdom will collapse is a foregone conclusion. Sooner or later, all states do collapse, and ramshackle, asymmetric dynastic amalgamations are more vulnerable than cohesive nation-states. Only the 'how' and the 'when' are mysteries of the future.
>
> An exhaustive study of the many pillars on which British power and prestige were built — ranging from the monarchy, the Royal Navy and the Empire to the Protestant Ascendancy, the Industrial Revolution, Parliament and Sterling — indicated that all without exception were in decline; some were already defunct, others seriously diminished or debilitated; it suggests that the last act may come sooner rather than later.110 Nothing implies that the end will necessarily be violent; some political organisms dissolve quietly. All it means is that present structures will one day disappear, and be replaced by something else.

p. 679 — [Quote page](https://www.leafyquotes.com/norman-davies/vanished-kingdoms/that-the-united.md)

> The difference between a referendum and a plebiscite is a fine one. Both pertain to collective decisions made by the direct vote of all qualified adults. The referendum, which derives from Swiss practice, involves an issue that is provisionally determined in advance, but that is then 'referred' for a final decision by the whole electorate.

p. 423 — [Quote page](https://www.leafyquotes.com/norman-davies/vanished-kingdoms/the-difference-between.md)

> Historians usually focus their attention on the past of countries that still exist, writing hundreds and thousands of books on British history, French history, German history, Russian history, American history, Chinese history, Indian history, Brazilian history or whatever. Whether consciously or not, they are seeking the roots of the present, thereby putting themselves in danger of reading history backwards. As soon as great powers arise, whether the United States in the twentieth century or China in the twenty-first, the call goes out for offerings on American History or Chinese History, and siren voices sing that today’s important countries are also those whose past is most deserving of examination, that a more comprehensive spectrum of historical knowledge can be safely ignored.

p. 4 — [Quote page](https://www.leafyquotes.com/norman-davies/vanished-kingdoms/historians-usually-focus.md)
