We are robust when errors in the representation of the unknown and understanding of random effects do not… — Nassim Nicholas Taleb
We are robust when errors in the representation of the unknown and understanding of random effects do not lead to adverse outcomes —fragile otherwise.
p. 107Source: Wikiquote · CC BY-SA 4.0
More from this book
I have respect for mother nature's methods of robustness (billions of years allow most of what is fragile to break); classical thought is more robust (in its respect for the unknown, the epistemic humility) than the modern post-Enlightenment naïve pseudoscientific autism. Thus my classical values make me advocate the triplet of erudition, elegance, and courage; against modernity’s phoniness, nerdiness and philistinism.
p. 107
An idea starts to be interesting when you get scared of taking it to its logical conclusion.
p. 3
A competitive athlete is painful to look at; trying hard to become an animal rather than a man, he will never be as fast as a cheetah or as strong as an ox.
p. 41

